A systematic review of bypass and retrieval techniques in the management of separated endodontic instruments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58342/MJ.V.3.I.1.5

Keywords:

Bypass, Retrieval, Separated instruments, Root canal

Abstract

Background and Objective: Management of separated instruments within the root canal is one of the major challenges in endodontic treatment, as it can significantly affect the final outcome. This complication not only increases technical difficulties but also requires careful selection of the appropriate management approach. Two commonly used techniques for handling separated instruments are bypass and retrieval. The present systematic review aimed to compare the success rate and effectiveness of these two approaches to provide evidence-based guidance for endodontists in clinical decision-making.

Materials and Methods: This study was conducted as a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines and PICO framework. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Google Scholar and Sciencedirect databases for studies published between 2010 and 2025. Articles including patients with separated instruments in root canals treated by either the bypass or retrieval technique were included. In total, 24 studies comprising 3,185 patients and involving molar, premolar, and anterior teeth were analyzed. Data were extracted and statistically compared to assess the success rates of both methods.

Results: The mean success rate for the bypass technique was 40.55% (median 37.5%, SD 20.89%), ranging from 15% to 81.2%. For the retrieval technique, the mean success rate was 48.01% (median 42.2%, SD 20.5%) with a range of 13% to 83.3%. Geographic variations were observed: for example, retrieval showed higher success in India, while bypass had greater success in Pakistan.

Conclusion: Both bypass and retrieval techniques are effective and reliable approaches for managing separated instruments within root canals. The choice between them should be based on tooth type, fracture location, available resources, and operator expertise. A judicious combination of both methods may further improve treatment outcomes. This systematic review provides valuable evidence to support more informed and optimized clinical decisions in endodontic practice.

Author Biographies

Mohammad Ali Yosofy, linic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

linic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

Ali Kalantari, Clinic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

Clinic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

Zahra Yosofy, Dentist, Herat, Afghanistan

Dentist, Herat, Afghanistan

Sayed Eshaq Amin, Clinic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

Clinic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

Mohammad Reza Zahid , Clinic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

Clinic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

Sina Homayoni , Clinic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

Clinic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ghalib University, Herat, Afghanistan

References

Gopal P, Rao, H. M. ., Prasad, B. S. K. . ., Umesh, S. ., & Shetty, R. . (2025). Instrument Retrieval in Endodontics: A Literature Review. Asian Journal of Dental and Health Sciences, 5(3), 13–15. .Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.22270/ajdhs.v5i3.133

Doumari B, Drouri S, El Kharroubi S, Skalli R, Benkiran I. Management of Intracanal Separated Instrument Using Bypassing and Braiding Techniques. European Journal of Dental and Oral Health. 2024;5(1):1-4.Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.24018/ejdent.2024.5.1.319

Natanasabapathy V, Varghese A, Karthikeyan PKA, Narasimhan S. Pattern of endodontic instrument separation and factors affecting its retrieval: a 10-year retrospective observational study in a postgraduate institute. Restor Dent Endod. 2025;50(1):e7.Available from:https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2025.50.e7

Alamoudi R, Alfarran A, Alnamnakani B, Howait M, Alghamdi N, Ain T. Assessment of Incidence, Management and Contributory Factors of Root Canal Instrument Separation in an Endodontics Post- Graduate Program: A Retrospective Clinical Study. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2024;27(1):16-21.Available from:https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_833_22

Madarati AA, Hunter MJ, Dummer PM. Management of intracanal separated instruments. J Endod. 2013;39(5):569-81.Available from:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2012.12.033

Al-Nazhan S, Al-Attas MH, Al-Maflehi N. Retrieval outcome of separated endodontic instruments by Saudi endodontic board residents: A Clinical retrospective study. Saudi Endodontic Journal. 2018;8(2):77-81.Available from:https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_13_18

Hindlekar A, Kaur G, Kashikar R, Kotadia P. Retrieval of Separated Intracanal Endodontic Instruments: A Series of Four Case Reports. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e35694.Available from:https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35694

Management of Intracanal Separated Instrument Using Bypassing and Braiding Techniques: Case Reports. European Journal of Dental and Oral Health. 2024;5(1):1-4.Available from:https://doi.org/10.24018/ejdent.2024.5.1.319

Nevares G, Cunha RS, Zuolo ML, da Silveira Bueno CE. Success Rates for Removing or Bypassing Fractured Instruments: A Prospective Clinical Study. Journal of Endodontics. 2012;38(4):442-4.Available from:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.12.009

Dioguardi M, Guerra C, Zhurakivska K, Sovereto D, Lo Muzio L, Martella A, et al. Endodontic Surgery for Separated Instrument Removal: Success Rates and Techniques in a Systematic Review. Dentistry Journal. 2025;13(10):449.Available

Dako T, Bica CI, Lazar L, Lazar A, Monea M. Separated instrument management as a procedural accident in endodontics using the EDTA (C10H16N2O8) aided bypassing technique and the ultrasonic removal method. an in Vitro study. Rev Chim. 2020;71(11):73-9.Available from:https://doi.org/10.37358/RC.20.11.8375

Dulhani O, Mukherjee M. Conservative Management of Separated Endodontic Instruments in the Root Canal--A Case Series. Indian Journal of Dental Advancements. 2019;11:52+.Available from:https://doi.org/10.5866/2019.11.10052

Zahran SS. Impact of anatomical and clinical variables on the success of endodontic instrument fragment retrieval. J Oral Sci. 2025;67(1):5-9.Available from:https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.24-0278

Hassan H, Ali SM, Khawar B, Riaz S, Zia R, Hameed M. Endodontic file separation and its management among dentists in Punjab, Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences. 2024;22:e233938.Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.20396/bjos.v22i00.8673938

Rahul M, Kapur A, Gauba K, Goyal A. Management of endodontic instrument separation in primary teeth. Journal of South Asian Association of Pediatric Dentistry. 2020;3(1):35.Available from:https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10077-3039

Arya A, Arora A, Thapak G. Retrieval of separated instrument from the root canal using ultrasonics: Report of three cases. Endodontology. 2019;31(1):121-4.Available from:https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_25_18

Sarangi S, Chandak MG, Relan KN, Chaudhari PS, Chandak P, Ikhar A. Retrieving Fragments: A Case Series on Managing Instrument Separation. Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University. 2022;17(2):429-32.Available from:https://doi.org/10.4103/jdmimsu.jdmimsu_192_22

Shiyakov KK, Vasileva RI. Success for removing or bypassing instruments fractured beyond the root canal curve–45 clinical cases. Journal of IMAB–Annual Proceeding Scientific Papers. 2014;20(3):567-71.Available from:http://dx.doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2014203.567

Shilpa-Jain D, Santosh SS, Archana D, Smita S, Saumya-Rajesh P, Velmurugan N. Knowledge-, attitude-, and practice-based survey on instrument separation and its management among endodontists and postgraduates in India-a cross-sectional web-based questionnaire. Saudi Endodontic Journal. 2021;11(1):80-7.Available from:https://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_187_19

Anand AV, Srirekha A, Jishnu P, Champa C, Shetty A, Adsare S. Prevalence of separated instruments in routine endodontic practice and its overall impact on the procedure: a questionnaire study. RGUHS Journal of Dental Sciences. 2023;15(2).Available from:https://doi.org/10.26463/rjds.15_2_4

Gupta R, Sharma, T., Charles, N., & Bedi, R. (2020). CLINICAL APPROACH TO THE MANAGEMENT OF FRACTURED INSTRUMENTS USING ULTRASONICS AND THE INSTRUMENT RETRIEVAL SYSTEM UNDER THE DENTAL OPERATING MICROSCOPE. International Journal of Medical and Biomedical Studies, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.32553/ijmbs.v4i3.1029.Available

Goswami K, Mangat P, Rajput N, Solanki M. endodontic-management-of-separated-instrument-a-case-series-of-instrument-retrieval October 2024 8110278977 9507716. PARIPEX-INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH. 2024;13:1-4.Available from:https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex

Arshadifar E, Shahabinejad H, Fereidooni R, Shahravan A, Kamyabi H. Possibility of bypassing three fractured rotary NiTi files and its correlation with the degree of root canal curvature and location of the fractured file: An in vitro study. Iranian Endodontic Journal. 2022;17(2):62.Available from:https://doi.org/10.22037/iej.v17i2.33922

Patil TN, Saraf PA, Penukonda R, VANAkI SS, Kamatagi L. A survey on nickel titanium rotary instruments and their usage techniques by endodontists in India. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2017;11(5):ZC29.Available from:https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/23936.9852

Mahale VD, Saxena T, Sharma S, Mohan EA. Quantitative analysis of troughing depth for successful instrument retrieval using the loop technique: A cross-sectional in vivo study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2025;28(4):360-5.Available from:https://doi.org/10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_844_24

Pruthi PJ, Nawal RR, Talwar S, Verma M. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of ultrasonic tips versus the Terauchi file retrieval kit for the removal of separated endodontic instruments. Restor Dent Endod. 2020;45(2):e14.Available from:10.5395/rde.2020.45.e14

Portigliatti R, Consoli Lizzi EP, Rodríguez PA. Predictive factors in the retrieval of endodontic instruments: the relationship between the fragment length and location. Restor Dent Endod. 2024;49(4):e35.Available from:https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e35

Solomonov M, Itzhak J, Kfir A, O v, Lipatova E, Farmakis E-T. Self-adjusting file (SAF) separation in clinical use: A preliminary survey among experienced SAF users regarding prevalence and retrieval methods. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2015;18:200-4.Available from:https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.157247

Rumyyan A, Alissa H, Alkuraidis H, Sager M, Alraffa S, Alhumud I, et al. The Prevalence of endodontic instrument separation among dental practitioners and dental students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2020;9(9):49-54.Available from:https://www.ijmrhs.com/medical-research/the-prevalence-of-endodontic-instrument-separation-among-dental-practitioners-and-dental-students-in-riyadh-saudi-arabia.pdf

Kumar BS, Krishnamoorthy S, Shanmugam S, PradeepKumar AR. The Time Taken for Retrieval of Separated Instrument and the Change in Root Canal Volume after Two Different Techniques Using Cbct: An: In-Vitro: Study. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2021;32(4):489-94.Available from:https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_403_21

Dioguardi M, Dello Russo C, Scarano F, Esperouz F, Ballini A, Sovereto D, et al. Analysis of Endodontic Successes and Failures in the Removal of Fractured Endodontic Instruments during Retreatment: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis. Healthcare. 2024;12(14):1390.Available from:https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12141390

Malentacca A, Zaccheo F, Rupe C, Lajolo C. Endodontic clinical outcome after separated instrument removal using a spinal needle technique: a retrospective study of thirty years of clinical experience. Journal of Endodontics. 2023;49(8):980-9.Available from:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2023.06.007

Piyush Oswal MB, Srinidhi S R et al. Success Outcomes for Bypass or Retrieval of Fractured Endodontic Instruments: A Systematic Review, 23 July 2025, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7098116/v1].Available

Natanasabapathy V, Varghese A, Karthikeyan PKA, Narasimhan S. Pattern of endodontic instrument separation and factors affecting its retrieval: a 10-year retrospective observational study in a postgraduate institute. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2025;50(1):rde. 2025.50. e7.Available from:https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2025.50.e7

Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2005;31(12):845-50.Available from:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000164127.62864.7c

Ym O-O, Escobar D, Jimenez F, Jaramillo Gil P, Orozco-Ocampo Y, Álvarez C. Factors influencing NiTi endodontic file separation: A thematic review. Dental and Medical Problems. 2024;61:269-78.Available from:https://doi.org/10.17219/dmp/156805

Published

2026-03-21

How to Cite

1.
Yosofy MA, Kalantari A, Yosofy Z, Amin SE, Zahid MR, Homayoni S. A systematic review of bypass and retrieval techniques in the management of separated endodontic instruments. مجلۀ علوم طبی غالب [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 21 [cited 2026 Mar. 24];3(1):59-86. Available from: https://www.mj.ghalib.edu.af/index.php/mj/article/view/96